בית פורומים חדשות אנש אין בילדער

מנע מגיפה מנחלתך / שלח רפו"ש לחולי עמך

שלום אורח. באפשרותך להתחבר או להירשם
הצג 15 הודעות בעמוד הוסף לדף האישי  דווח למנהל שלח לחבר
נשלח ב-6/6/2004 22:59 לינק ישיר 
מנע מגיפה מנחלתך / שלח רפו"ש לחולי עמך





Cancer Patients Pray, Use Herbs, But Quietly


NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - Eighty-five percent of U.S. cancer patients turn to prayer when they learn they have cancer, U.S. researchers said on Sunday.


A study of 750 patients around the country found that most use prayer, relaxation techniques, exercise and sometimes herbs or megavitamins on top of their medical therapies.


"We were a bit surprised by how many people were using these techniques," said Jennifer Yates, an information analyst at the University of Rochester in New York who led the study.


"And we don't really know why they're using them -- to beat the cancer or to ease the side effects of treatment. Those are questions we still have to ask."


Speaking to a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (news - web sites) meeting in New Orleans, Yates said 85 percent of the patients surveyed used prayer as a cancer treatment technique.


"It's not surprising that people facing serious illnesses pray, or have others praying for them. They believe it may have a positive impact on their overall health and well-being," said Yates, whose work was funded by the National Cancer Institute (news - web sites) and American Cancer Society (news - web sites).


About a quarter of those surveyed said they used large doses of vitamins or changed their diets to improve their health.


Just last week the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, one of the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites), released a report saying more than 60 percent of Americans overall used prayer or other alternative or complementary therapies.


But most of the patients said they never mentioned these outside techniques to their doctors.


"The typical doctor-patient encounter often leaves no room or time for a discussion of alternative and complementary therapies," said Rochester oncologist Dr. Jennifer Griggs.


"In addition, many patients do not want to discuss issues of spirituality with their doctors. On the other hand, it is important that patients tell their doctors what herbs or other medications they are taking to prevent interactions between cancer therapies and their complementary therapies."





דווח על תוכן פוגעני

מנותק
נשלח ב-8/6/2004 00:56 לינק ישיר 





Anti-Cholesterol Pill May Ward Off Cancer

Mon Jun 7,12:14 PM ET Add Health - AP to My Yahoo!


By DANIEL Q. HANEY, AP Medical Editor

NEW ORLEANS - People taking statins to lower their cholesterol and ward off heart attacks may have even more reason to keep swallowing their medicine: New data suggests the drugs also may fight off cancer.

Yahoo! Health
Have questions about your health?
Find answers here.






The latest evidence, released Sunday at a large cancer conference, found that people who took statins for at least five years appeared to cut their risk of colon cancer in half. Earlier work has shown reductions in breast and prostate cancer as well as across-the-board cancer risk.


Experts have other reasons to think the statins might be cancer fighters. Experiments involving lab animals and cells growing in test tubes both suggest a possible role for statins.


However, researchers seem unanimous in saying the evidence is still too weak to recommend taking statins for cancer-prevention alone, although they acknowledge those on the pills for other reasons may be getting a big bonus benefit.


The data so far "fit with what we know from the lab," said Dr. Monica Morrow of Northwestern University. "But we can't say this is enough proof for people to go out and take statins."


To be convinced, doctors say they would need to see a carefully controlled experiment designed specifically to show that statins reduce cancer risk. The data so far are based largely on watching what happens to people who go on statins for reasons that have nothing to do with cancer.


The latest of these studies, directed by Dr. Stephen Gruber of the University of Michigan, was presented at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (news - web sites).


His team, working in Israel, looked at 1,708 people who had colon cancer and 1,737 who did not. Those on statins for at least five years had about a 50 percent reduction in the risk of this malignancy.


Adjusting for other factors that could possibly explain the difference, such as better health habits, did not change the strong link between statins and lowered risk. Also, those who took other varieties of cholesterol drugs had no cancer protection.


"I think these data are very exciting and potentially good news for future studies that will allow us to come up with clinical recommendations," Gruber said.


However, experts have been misled by such data in the past. For instance, based on similar studies, doctors long believed that taking estrogen supplements after menopause would lower women's risk heart attacks. A careful experiment eventually proved this wrong, and it is still unclear why the estrogen users seemed to have less risk.


If statins do lower the risk of cancer, scientists say it may have nothing to do with their effect on cholesterol. One theory is that statins could ward off the disease by lowering inflammation. Another is that their primary job — reducing an enzyme called HMG CoA — could block the working of some cancer-causing genes.


One concern of suggesting statins to prevent cancer without definitive proof of their worth is the risk of exposing people to possible side effects, even when the risk is small. Statins can cause muscle and liver problems.


"The consensus is yes, this agent does have the ability to reduce the incidence of breast cancer, but the risk of blood clots needs to be kept in mind," said the study's director, Dr. Silvana Martino of the Cancer Institute Medical Group in Santa Monica, Calif.


Statins are hardly the first drugs with possible unanticipated benefits. Aspirin, once just a painkiller, is now a mainstay of preventing and treating heart attacks, and some evidence suggests it, too, can lower the risk of colon cancer.


The bone-strengthening drug Evista, or raloxifene, appears to substantially lower the risk of breast cancer in older women who are at relatively low risk of the disease. New long-term follow-up data, presented at the conference, showed a 66 percent reduction after eight years of use for osteoporosis.


The Evista study also showed the drug doubled the risk of potentially hazardous blood clots in the veins.





___

Medical Editor Daniel Q. Haney is a special correspondent for The Associated Press.

___

On the Net:

Society of Clinical Oncology: http://www.asco.org





דדווח על תוכן פוגעני

מנותק
נשלח ב-8/6/2004 00:58 לינק ישיר 

יעדן טאג נייעס איז דאס וועגן נייע דורכברוכן אין טרעפן א רפואה פאר די ביטערע מחלה ל"ע ה"י

אבער ליידער, האלט נאך אלעס ביי די פריע פאזעס פון שטודיעס, און דערווייל...

השם ירחם, ואין לנו על מי להשען אלא על איבנו שבשמים!





Early Chemo Promising Vs. Brain Cancer

38 minutes ago Add Health - AP to My Yahoo!


By DANIEL Q. HANEY, AP Medical Editor

NEW ORLEANS - Early low-dose chemotherapy appears to substantially improve short-term survival in patients with the most aggressive and common form of brain cancer, offering the first significant advance against the disease in decades.



Whether the treatment can help cure brain cancer remains to be seen, but the approach at least seems to slow the often rapid progression of the disease for some.


The treatment, tested in a form of brain cancer called glioblastoma multiforme, involves the drug Temodar. Until now, the medicine has typically been used only after radiation to shrink the tumor.


A major international study released Monday shows that giving low doses of the capsule at the very start — for six or seven weeks during and after radiation — doubles the chance of being alive two years later.


"This is the first trial that has been clearly positive in brain cancer in 30 years," said Dr. M.J. van den Bent of the Daniel den Hoed Oncology Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. "This is a great day."


Radiation and surgery are the first-line treatments for glioblastomas, but even with them the disease usually kills within a year or less. Intravenous chemotherapy available since the 1970s improves these odds only marginally and can have serious side effects.


Several doctors predicted that upfront Temodar will quickly become the new standard of care, routinely offered to all victims of this disease.


"To be able to tell people they may have two or three years of survival rather than nine months is pretty major," said Dr. Adam Mamelak of City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., who was not involved in the study.


The study was conducted and financed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and released in New Orleans at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (news - web sites). It was done at more than 80 hospitals in Europe, Canada and Australia.


The study's director, Dr. Roger Stupp of University Hospital in Lausanne, Switzerland, said patients found the drug easy to take, and fatigue was the most common ill effect.


"We have started with the most malignant and devastating form" of brain cancer, he said. The next step will be to try the drug against less aggressive tumors and combine it with the newer, so-called targeted drugs designed to block cancer's internal growth signals.


Unlike most cancer, which kills by spreading through the body, glioblastomas grow quickly inside the head, destroying everything in their path. They are the most aggressive of the 100 or so forms of cancer that originate in the brain, and they account for half or more of all cases. Around the world, 175,000 cases are diagnosed annually, killing 125,000.


In the new study, 573 patients were randomly given standard treatment with or without early Temodar. After two years, 26 percent receiving Temodar were still alive, compared with just 10 percent getting the usual care.


Even with the treatment, most patients died quickly. Nevertheless, doctors said doubling short-term survival is an important milestone in such a grim disease.


"Twenty-six percent survival is not that great in the large scheme of things. But it is still progress," said Dr. Frank Haluska of Massachusetts General Hospital.


Until now, chemotherapy has also not had an important role in treating prostate cancer, which is much more common. At the meeting Monday, other researchers released details of studies that led the Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites) last month to approve use of Taxotere, a standard chemotherapy drug, for men with advanced cases of this malignancy.


Before these studies, no treatment had been found to improve survival in prostate cancer. Spreading cancer can be suppressed with hormone treatment, but eventually this approach fails, and patients typically die within a year.





Two large studies released at the meeting show that Taxotere can improve survival in these men by a median of about two months, although some lived several years while on the drug.

"This is reason for celebration, because there is a survival advantage, and there is also reason for optimism, but we have a long way to go in these patients," said Dr. Mario Eisenberger of Johns Hopkins University, who headed one of the studies.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE: Medical Editor Daniel Q. Haney is a special correspondent for The Associated Press.

___

On the Net:

http://www.asco.org





דדווח על תוכן פוגעני

מנותק
   
בית > פורומים > אקטואליה וחדשות > חדשות אנש אין בילדער > מנע מגיפה מנחלתך / שלח רפו"ש לחולי עמך
מנהל לחץ כאן לנעילת האשכול
הוסף לעמוד האישי  דווח למנהל שלח לחבר

bholext