תפוצת לימוד תורה בעם ישראל

ובעצם עוד אכתוב, שגם מבחינה דקדוקית 'קרא מקרא' אינו יכול להתפרש קריאת מקרא קודש, ועיקר חסר מן הספר, 'מקרא' בביטוי 'מקרא קודש' הוא סמיכות, ואי אפשר להפרידו. השימוש היחידי של המקרא כמלה יחידה הוא בנחמיה ושם פירושו 'מקרא' כמובנו הנ"ל, כפי שגם אתה הזכרת.

יש להאריך אבל כעת אכתוב רק שיש בעיה קטנה והיא שראש חודש אינו מקרא קודש

and the promises! who could have dare to promise that one who donates to KUPAT HA'IR before YOM HADIN (which of course is interpetated metaphorically) wouldnt be hurted all along the year to come?!... it's easily falsifiable!

dinosaurus the verse "Hodesh v'shabat KRO MIKRA" understood by traditional comentators as in MIKRA KODESH, not as reading in Bible (modern meaning of MIKRA. indeed this word is mentioned in Nehemia but only after it's known what they had read, and means "they got what they read", but not MIKRA=Bible ). it's amusing how you simply insert this... BTW, I enjoyed reading your comment 5. what evokes the question: what "history" we'll be able to find if, say, NETUREY KARTA, or editors of YATED NE'EMAN, would write the history. maybe a dinosaour would find a consistency along their writings but what would be the historical value of something written from fundamentalists' prisma? we undoubtly would get impressed by their 'pure' & 'holy' thought, no one hint about personal interesthe equation of Non-YATED=profound immorality and heresy, a whole nation led by YATED's GDOILIM (except an unimportant minority to whon YATED's AL SEDER HAYOM is addressed) and a dinosaour who would say in highest self confidence that 'a testimony' is the most reliable source-of-information we can have about the distant past, and not, for instance, archeological findings which indicate that YATED was not accepted by all nation or Bne Brak was a very little and primitive city so it was not Israeli capital city in 2011 BE. appatently they believe YATED and used internet just as a failure of weakness...

בעל בעמיו