תפוצת לימוד תורה בעם ישראל

בעל בעמיו

dinosaurus the verse "Hodesh v'shabat KRO MIKRA" understood by traditional comentators as in MIKRA KODESH, not as reading in Bible (modern meaning of MIKRA. indeed this word is mentioned in Nehemia but only after it's known what they had read, and means "they got what they read", but not MIKRA=Bible ). it's amusing how you simply insert this... BTW, I enjoyed reading your comment 5. what evokes the question: what "history" we'll be able to find if, say, NETUREY KARTA, or editors of YATED NE'EMAN, would write the history. maybe a dinosaour would find a consistency along their writings but what would be the historical value of something written from fundamentalists' prisma? we undoubtly would get impressed by their 'pure' & 'holy' thought, no one hint about personal interesthe equation of Non-YATED=profound immorality and heresy, a whole nation led by YATED's GDOILIM (except an unimportant minority to whon YATED's AL SEDER HAYOM is addressed) and a dinosaour who would say in highest self confidence that 'a testimony' is the most reliable source-of-information we can have about the distant past, and not, for instance, archeological findings which indicate that YATED was not accepted by all nation or Bne Brak was a very little and primitive city so it was not Israeli capital city in 2011 BE. appatently they believe YATED and used internet just as a failure of weakness...

and the promises! who could have dare to promise that one who donates to KUPAT HA'IR before YOM HADIN (which of course is interpetated metaphorically) wouldnt be hurted all along the year to come?!... it's easily falsifiable!