Dearest Baachi,
I do agree that you have a problem in understanding what I write but I'm not sure where the fault lies.
Take my post where I spoke about Deroshes Chazal, you understood that I'm questioning or even mocking them but if you will please go over this paragraph you would see otherwise
''You have found answers to the Old (testament) [possibly good ones] you'll find answers to the New. Don't want to bother? Fine, but why the innocence?
Can you see those little words ''possibly good ones'' or shall I try to post stuff in bigger letters?
My point was that you shouldn't be so innocently perplexed when you yourself are no novice to textual manipulation and rationalization
You maybe saw that you were misunderstanding me, but Sharey Terutzim Lo Ninalu so your Terutz is that I didn't put the punctuation mark in the right place, well well
Reminds me of the two Yeshiva bochurim who were eating at various Baaley Batim. One was complaining that every day he they give him Kasha (it being a cheap dish) so the other said; I am much worse off because I get excuses, different excuses why they didn't prepare for me etc. so I stay hungry, ''mit kasha ken men noch leben ober mit terutzim nisht''
Oh, and that Melamed of yours hmm it seems that we actually learned in the same Yeshiva but strangely enough I always remember him shouting at everyone ''do I need to spoon-feed you? Can't you think a bit on your own?
Uh oh, now I gave away my age.
 |
|
|